Every project becoming a program?
As suggested by “The Experience Trap” series I’ve been running, in the very near future, the skills and competencies to lead future initiatives will be those of a program and portfolio manager.
I’m not sure that the way we approach methodology is helping. As an example, my local PMI chapter is sponsoring a speaker on Adaptive Project Framework, a methodology that tries to square the circle between traditional and extreme PM approaches. Per the invitation e-mail:
Those projects for which both the goal and the solution to reach it are clearly defined are well-supported by traditional project management (TPM) approaches. Those projects whose goal and solution are not clearly defined are well-supported by extreme project management (xPM) approaches. But what about those projects whose goal is clearly defined but whose solution is not? A new approach called Adaptive Project Framework (APF)…
But aren’t today’s complex projects more about the challenges of combining these approaches (rather than either/or)? In other words, aren’t we first building or upgrading a platform (usually done w/ traditional “waterfall” approaches), then attaching or layering components large and small on that platform (usually done w/ agile, iterative, or adaptive methods)? This trend is happening across industries — aerospace w/ the A380 and B787, software w/the SAP Business Process Platform, Enterprise Services, and Custom Development, construction w/ more manufacturing and pre-assembly off-site.
I’m afraid this signals the impending commoditization of PM — today’s project manager skills and competencies will only get you a team leader role tomorrow.
Filed under: Complexity, IT Strategy, Leadership, Methodology, PMO, Portfolio Management, Program Management, SAP, Skills vs. competencies



[...] Byron (here) reinforces the urgency to start thinking of ”every project as a program” (here). NetWeaver revenue is nearing $2 billion on a trailing 12 month basis (SAP says it’s only a [...]