Posted on July 15, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
Inspired by a post on Sharp End Training’s blog (here), my post (here), and a comment by PM Hut…
FYI, moved to right sidebar
Filed under: Communications, Leadership, PMO, People Development, Performance Management, Portfolio Management, Program Management, Project Management, Project Success Factors, Quality Management, Requirements Management, Scope Management, Stakeholder management | Tagged: corner cutting, Elizabeth Harrin, Girl's Guide to Project Management, Jonathan Senior, Paul Ritchie, PM Hut, Sharp End Training | No Comments »
Posted on July 10, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
Elizabeth included this post from Sharp End Training’s blog (here). I agree with her assessment of the post. It is a good question but I would have like to seen a take on which corners are typically cut, not why corners were cut. FWIW, here are my top ten corners typically cut:
Stakeholder management planning
Executing planned [...]
Filed under: Communications, Leadership, PMO, People Development, Performance Management, Program Management, Project Management, Project Success Factors, Quality Management, Requirements Management, Scope Management, Stakeholder management | Tagged: Paul Ritchie, corner cutting, Jonathan Senior, Elizabeth Harrin, Girl's Guide to Project Management, Sharp End Training | 3 Comments »
Posted on July 4, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
With all my recent scope management posts lately, here’s a timely post on benefits realization (here) at John Gough’s iJourneys blog (here). I like the theme of his post, that “…benefit realisation does not start when the project ends.” I also second his point that IT sees itself as apart from the “business” and [...]
Filed under: Organizational Change Management, PMO, Performance Management, Portfolio Management, Program Management, Project Management, Project Success Factors, Requirements Management, Scope Management, Strategy Management | Tagged: benefits, benefits realization, business alignment, business change, John Gough | No Comments »
Posted on June 26, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
WordPress added a feature called “Possibly Related Posts” that identifies posts that may be of interest of the readers of one’s post (explained here). I’ve left the feature on in my blog, but I forgot about it until I saw two new blogs in my “Clicks” stats (from my Triple Constraint posts here and here)
Sit down [...]
Filed under: Project Management, Random, Requirements Management, Time Management | Tagged: Paul Ritchie, Triple Constraint, projects and life, related posts, Scope, Time, Cost, Quality | No Comments »
Posted on June 23, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
I’ve gotten a lot of good comments on my previous post on the Triple Constraint. Just a couple of clarifications, at least from my perspective:
I don’t want to minimize how useful the Triple Constraint is in understanding the basic trade-offs that one must make among scope, time, and resources.
That said, it is a basic heuristic [...]
Filed under: Business Case, Leadership, Performance Management, Program Management, Project Management, Project Success Factors, Requirements Management, Time Management | No Comments »
Posted on June 22, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
Thought-provoking post by mysticMundane on the Triple Constraint (here) – hat-tip to Michael at IT Project Failures (here). IMO, both yielded good insights, with some caveats. The good:
I always like to see quality included as essential to the triple constraint — Michael has the picture here — the scope isn’t delivered unless the work product conforms to requirements.
Scope [...]
Filed under: Business Case, Leadership, PMO, Program Management, Project Management, Project Success Factors, Quality Management, Requirements Management, Stakeholder management, Time Management | Tagged: Paul Ritchie | 3 Comments »
Posted on June 21, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
I got some feedback that it was closed. Oops…I had forgotten that I had arbitrarily closed it after one week. Sorry.
Here it is again. I’ll also maintain a link in the upper right sidebar.
Filed under: Performance Management, Project Success Factors, Requirements Management, Stakeholder management, Strategy Management, Troubled Projects | Tagged: Paul Ritchie | No Comments »
Posted on June 9, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
Interesting study reported by siliconrepublic.com (here) on the relative importance of project success measures among the Irish project management community
The most important measure[s] of success among the respondent project managers [were] to achieve organisational objectives (70pc)… and matching stakeholder expectations key for 63pc.
Being on time and on budget were only rated about half as highly, which [...]
Filed under: Business Case, Implementation Costs, PMO, Performance Management, Project Success Factors, Requirements Management, Stakeholder management | No Comments »
Posted on April 30, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
Craig challenged the inclusion of intangible benefits in a business case (here). I replied to his comments, but I thought I’d convert it to a post. Craig commented:
You know, I’m not so much a fan of putting intangible benefits into the business case. Into the presentation and discussions yes. Into the document, not really. How [...]
Filed under: Business Case, PMO, Project Success Factors, Requirements Management | 4 Comments »
Posted on March 19, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
In a break from the KM roll I’ve been on, I see that Craig at Better Projects has dipped his toes into one of those religious debates: to use process models or use cases (here)? SAP always has had a strong project process bias, but eSOA and custom development concept is forcing a shotgun marriage of the concepts. [...]
Filed under: Innovation, Methodology, PMO, Requirements Management, SAP | 1 Comment »