Posted on April 27, 2009 by Paul Ritchie
I’ve been working on an initiative called “Value Delivery,” which will incorporate value management into our various PMO methods, tools, etc. These activities are often listed as typical PMO functions, but this really only honored in the breach. Value management never seems to take off given a PMO’s traditional emphasis on implementing project management methods, tools, training, etc.
In our approach, we will ensure that value management has its own identity, especially when it comes to training. While value and benefit management is baked into the various program and portfolio standards around, it isn’t part of the typical project manager’s skill set. Rolling out value management separately should emphasize the organizational and personal changes required to be successful.
What is value management’s objective? To ensure that execution remains focused on delivering against executives’s and stakeholder expectations. How does value management happen? Maybe the best way to illustrate is to briefly lay out the lifecycle we’re using below:
- Value Discovery: Establish a performance baseline
- Value Realization: Identify required process improvements and KPIs
- Value Optimization: Review and steer benefit attainment
Filed under: Performance Management, PMO, Portfolio Management, Program Management, Project Management, Strategy Management | Tagged: alignment, business alignment, Value Management | 7 Comments »
Posted on April 10, 2009 by Paul Ritchie
Posted on March 2, 2009 by Paul Ritchie
FYI, a Wall Street Journal article (“Dangers of Clinging to Solutions of the Past”) based in part on interviews w/ yours truly came out today (link here, page B4 in the paper). Thanks to Kishore Sengupta of INSEAD for pointing the WSJ my way and to Phred Dvorak of the WSJ for conveying the perils of experience so well and so succinctly.
As I’ve noted to a couple of colleagues, it is hard to believe that only 250 words of copy came out of two hours of interview time. Insert your own joke re: my verbosity here…
Filed under: Complexity, Knowledge Management, Organizational Change Management, People Development, Performance Management, PMO, Portfolio Management, Program Management, Project Management, Project Success Factors | Tagged: INSEAD, Kishore Sengupta, Paul Ritchie, Phred Dvorak, The Experience Trap, Wall Street Journal | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 17, 2009 by Paul Ritchie
I like the title of Sanjay Saini’s post on the lack of communication between project managers and senior management — “Make the Effort.” One can quibble with his specific suggestions, but his exhortation to communication more regularly, frequently,and transparently is right on:
Reviewing progress and profitability should not be something that waits until year’s end. Instead there should be some monthly or quarterly checkpoints in between. This regular communication should also include client feedback–both good and bad.
Filed under: Communications, Performance Management, PMO, Program Management, Project Management, Stakeholder management | Tagged: business alignment, Sanjay Saini | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 14, 2009 by Paul Ritchie
After a round of performance reviews with my team, I’m so with Jonathan Becher about the pitfalls of management by objectives (here). It is easy to fall into the vicious cycle he describes, where
MBOs that measure outputs, rather than impact, [which then] cause outputs to decrease. Which encourages more bad management by bad objectives.
Poor MBO procesess also tend to encourage Pareto suboptimal solutions to business problems, especially when coupled with an out-of-whack incentive structure. Like where the incentives for individual objectives — oh, let’s say bonus payments for objective achievement — outweigh those for more organization-wide objectives (e.g., firm margin, revenue growth, market share).
Not that I’ve seen that anywhere…
Filed under: Performance Management | Tagged: Jonathan Becher, manage by walking around, management by objective, SMART objectives | 5 Comments »
Posted on December 24, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
Per an earlier post (here), I have a bee in my bonnet about “supporting” deliverables and how to measure their success. The excellent comments from Glen and Stephen (here) pointed to the answer. From Glen:
We are looking for cost savings, efficiencies, and other process improvements. This is the typical work flow process improvement approach. Extend that to the human processes – monetized – and you can define MOP’s and MOE’s [measures of performance and effectiveness respectively].
In retrospect, it should be obvious that training deliverables — and their measures and incentives — should make such deliverables accountable for the relevant process/solution/project/program success measures. In other words, CRM call center training should be judged by the how well the call center solution delivers the intended capabilities.
This approach is not so obvious to many training professionals, largely because many have never been held to the same standard as process owners. My experience — from observing a particularly savvy SAP customer — is that a few pointed questions do concentrate the trainers’ minds:
- Are you worried that the training does not support the actual execution of the processes?
- What do we need to change in our training approach so that it delivers value to the project?
- Why am I spending money on training if it can’t be held accountable for project/process succeess?
- Do you still wonder why trainers aren’t better paid?
Filed under: Implementation Costs, Methodology, Organizational Change Management, Performance Management | Tagged: deliverables, ERP training, measures, metrics, soft stuff, Training | Leave a comment »
Posted on November 22, 2008 by Paul Ritchie
Apprehension, uncertainty, waiting, expectation, fear of surprise, do a patient more harm than any exertion.
This quote resonates during these uncertain and surprising times. Florence Nightingale was one of the first medical professionals to recognize that the mind and body work, or don’t work, together. Her insight was not merely derived from anecdote. She pioneered the use of statistics in medicine, especially the visual representation of those statistics for non-expert audiences (example here).
Most of us don’t need a statistical analysis to know our teams will flounder without direction, especially now. I’ve found a couple of posts that address this challenge:
- Rita McGrath points out (here) one approach to getting teams unstuck — clarifying assumptions, reaching out to the future, and making decision rationales clear.
- John Baldoni focuses (here) on just how and why these are especially tough times for managers, and gives some suggestions that parallel Rita’s.
Filed under: Communications, Leadership, Organizational Change Management, Performance Management | Tagged: financial crisis, Florence Nightingale, John Baldoni, layoffs, PM Quote of the Day, Rita McGrath, team building, uncertainty | Leave a comment »